Background
On July 27, 2006, President Bush signed into law a bill known as
the Adam Walsh Act. States must comply with this federal
legislation by July 27, 2009, or risk losing 10% of a federal
law enforcement grant. The Ohio General Assembly chose to
implement the Adam Walsh Act this year, and passed Senate Bill
10 and Senate Bill 97 in an effort to comply with the federal
legislation.
New tier structure
The Adam Walsh Act and Ohio Senate Bill 10 organize sex
offender classification into three Tiers. Classification
is based solely on the offense of conviction; a person’s
likelihood to reoffend will no longer be considered.
Registration and verification duties:
Tier I: registration duties last 15 years
for adults, 10 years for juveniles; in-person verification at
the county sheriff’s office is required annually.
Tier II: registration duties last 25 years for adults, 20
years for juveniles; in-person verification is required every
180 days.
Tier III: registration duties
last a lifetime for adults and for juveniles; in-person verification is
required every 90 days.
Click here for a chart of which Ohio
offenses fall into which Tier.
These forms are provided to help you
file pleadings in your case without the assistance of a lawyer.
You can print these forms, fill in the blanks, and file them
with the court. Be sure to carefully read and follow the
instructions. If possible, please consult with an attorney
about your case.
Petition to Contest
Reclassification: File this motion within 60 days
of the day you received your Notice of New Classification from
the Ohio Attorney General, if you want to contest your
reclassification. Use this form if you were convicted as an
adult in common pleas court. (Click
here for a Rich Text Format version)
Motion for Relief from
Community Notification: If you were previously labeled a
sexually oriented offender or a habitual sex offender and were
not subject to community notification, and you have now been
reclassified a Tier III offender with a community notification
requirement, you can file this motion to ask the court to
relieve you of the new community notification requirement. (Click
here for a Rich Text Format version)
Petition to Contest
Reclassification for Juvenile Offender Registrants: File
this motion within 60 days of the day you received your Notice
of New Classification from the Ohio Attorney General, if you
want to contest your reclassification. Use this form if you
were adjudicated as a juvenile in juvenile court.
Testimony offered by the Office of the Ohio Public Defender
The Office of the Ohio Public Defender testified several times in
opposition to this legislation as it moved through the state
legislature. OPD’s opposition focused primarily on two points:
retroactivity and juvenile offenders. Click below to read the
testimony offered by OPD:
-
Senate Judiciary–Criminal Justice
Committee, May 2, 2007, regarding retroactivity
-
Senate Judiciary–Criminal Justice
Committee, May 2, 2007, regarding juveniles
-
Memo to Senate Committee,
May 7, 2007, outlining proposed changes regarding juveniles
-
House Criminal Justice Committee,
June 7, 2007, regarding retroactivity
-
House Criminal Justice
Committee, June 7, 2007, regarding juveniles
-
House Criminal Justice Committee,
June 14, 2007, regarding juveniles
Federal Guidelines for Implementation
In January 2009, the SMART Office
informed the State of Ohio that it is not in substantial
compliance with the requirements of the federal Adam Walsh Act.
Click here to read the letter.
In February 2009, the Office of the Ohio Public Defender and 18
other organizations and individuals sent a letter to Ohio’s
governor and attorney general, urging Ohio to seek a one-year
extension for compliance with the federal Act, rather than rush
to comply by the July 27, 2009 deadline.
Click here to read the
letter.
In May 2007, the U.S. Attorney General’s
office issued Proposed Guidelines for the implementation of the
Adam Walsh Act. The guidelines were open for public comment
through August 1, 2007. The Office of the Ohio Public Defender
submitted comments regarding retroactivity, juveniles, and
substantial compliance. OPD also signed onto comment submitted
by the Juvenile Justice Initiative of Voices for Ohio’s
Children.
Additional information
On June 29, 2007, the Ohio Attorney General sent letters to
approximately 200 people whose 10-year registration duties were
set to expire during the month of July 2007. This letter
informed people that, due to SB 10, their registration duties
may not actually expire as previously scheduled.
Click here to read a
copy of the letter.
The Ohio Attorney General has prepared
forms that are to be given to persons convicted or adjudicated
of eligible offenses between July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007,
informing them of their duties to register as of January 1,
2008.
The Ohio Attorney
General’s office has prepared a summary of what Ohio’s juvenile
sex offender registration system (JSORN) looks like, after January 1, 2008.
Click here to read this summary.
OPD prepared this one-page
(front & back) handout that briefly summarizes the impact SB 10
will have on juveniles. This may be a helpful introduction to
the Adam Walsh Act for children, parents, treatment providers,
and other non-lawyers impacted by SB 10.
Other Resources
News Articles
|
► |
Sex offenders win human rights claim
(The Independent © 12/19/2008)
Two convicted sex offenders today won
groundbreaking rulings that their "indefinite" registration on
the sex offenders register with no right of review is
"incompatible" with their human rights.
|
|
► |
Sex-offender registries across U.S. 'inconsistent'
(The Columbus Dispatch © 12/16/2008)
WASHINGTON -- Sex-offender registries are
often inaccurate and incomplete, undermining public knowledge
about some of the nation's most reviled criminals, Justice
Department investigators warn.
|
| ► |
Ruling doesn’t end challenges of sex offender classifications
(Advertiser-Tribune.com © 10/12/2008)
The recent decision upholding
retroactive application of Megan's Law reclassification of those
convicted of sex offenses does not cancel court challenges of
cases involving the Adam Walsh Act.
|
"In the
part of this universe that we know there is great
injustice, and often the good suffer, and often the
wicked prosper, and one hardly knows which of those is
the more annoying"
Bertrand Russell