Office of the Ohio Public Defender Logo

8 East Long Street - 11th Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215

(614) 466-5394

(800) 686-1573

 
Adam Walsh Act

| Home Page 


Attorney Information

Senate Bill 10

Sample Motions

Court Orders

Challenges

Class Action Lawsuit, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio

Filed by the Cuyahoga County Public Defender Office, the Office of the Ohio Public Defender, the ACLU of Ohio Foundation, and the Ohio Justice and Policy Center, this lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that the 60-day time limit on the filing of challenge petitions and the provisions that require community notification for newly-classified Tier III offenders without a prior hearing violate the procedural aspect of the Due Process Clause.

Class Action Lawsuit, Hamilton County

Filed by the Ohio Justice and Policy Center, this lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of Senate Bill 10 based on the Contracts Clause, Retroactivity Clause, Due Process Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause, Inalienable Rights Clause, and Separation of Powers Doctrine of the Ohio Constitution.

Class Action Lawsuit, Licking County

Filed by the Ohio Justice and Policy Center on behalf of adult and juvenile registrants, this lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of Senate Bill 10 based on the Contracts Clause, Retroactivity Clause, Due Process Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause, Inalienable Rights Clause, and Separation of Powers Doctrine of the Ohio Constitution.

Appeals

  • State of Ohio ex rel. S___ K___ v. Hon. Jeffrey M. Welbaum, Judge
    Filed in the 2nd  District, this is a complaint for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, asking the Court to order Judge Welbaum to appoint counsel at state expense to represent Ms. K. in her efforts to challenge reclassification under SB 10.

  • In re Darian S.
    Filed in the 3rd District, this appeal concerns the classification of a juvenile offender.  Contains constitutional arguments, as well as the argument that because of the effective dates of SB 10, there was no sex offender classification law in effect from July 1 through Dec. 31, 2007.

  • State of Ohio vs. M_____ B____
    Filed in the 7th District, this appeal from the Municipal Court of Columbiana County challenges the application of SB 10 to a defendant whose offense occurred prior to the enactment of SB 10.  Contains constitutional claims, as well as the argument that because of the effective dates of SB 10, there was no sex offender classification law in effect from July 1 through Dec. 31, 2007.

County Information


| Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Accessibility | Contact Us |