|
Attorney
Information
Senate
Bill 10
Sample
Motions
The OPD Juvenile Section filed
these motions for seven juveniles who were to be included on eSORN.
Cuyahoga, Montgomery, Pickaway, and Scioto counties granted TROs for
six of the juveniles. Although there is juvenile-specific
language included, much of the language should be useful for anyone
filing a request for a TRO.
Sample
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
The OPD Juvenile Section filed
these motions for seven juveniles who were to be included on eSORN.
Stark County granted an injunction for one of the juveniles. Although
there is juvenile-specific language included, much of the language
should be useful to anyone filing a request for an injunction.
Motion
for Relief from Community Notification and Motion for Temporary Stay
Affidavit
of Indigency
Petition
to Contest Reclassification and Application of §§ 2950.01, et seq.
Motion
to Stay Enforcement of Community Notification
Entry
to Stay Enforcement of Community Notification
Objection
to Reclassification under SB 10
From the Montgomery County Public Defender office, this motion
challenges the reclassification of a petitioner who was originally
classified during the 6-month period (July–December 2007) during
which courts should have been holding “dual” classification
hearings, and both classifying defendants under the old SORN law and
informing them of their new registration duties under AWA.
Also contains argument that there was no relevant law in effect
during that 6-month period.
Petition
to Contest Reclassification for Juvenile Offender Registrants
Brief
Challenging Constitutionality of SB10
Response
to Argument that Constitutional Challenges cannot be raised in SB10
hearing
Court
Orders
Judges Cain and Bender have issued identical orders
Franklin
County Entry to Stay Enforcement of Community Notification
Franklin
County Order Granting Final Relief from Community Notification
Franklin
County Order Invoking Stark County Injunction
Franklin
County Entry Denying Request for Preliminary Injunction
This vacates the order from Judge Holbrook, linked directly above.
Franklin
County Entry Staying Enforcement of Community Notification (Judge
Brown)
Franklin
County Order to not collect filing fees on SB 10 petitions
Geauga
County county-wide stay
Hamilton
County Stay Order
This
was issued in response to the Motion for Immediate Relief from
Community Notification above.
Hamilton
County Entry Staying Enforcement of Community Notification
Hamilton
County Entry Staying Community Notification
Lawrence
County entry denying counsel
Licking
County Entry Denying Counsel
Licking
County Stay Order
Licking
County Preliminary Injunction Order
Logan
County Entry Appointing Counsel for SB10 Challenge Hearing
Mahoning
County county-wide stay
Medina
County County-Wide Stay
Ottawa
County Entry Staying Enforcement of Community Notification
Pickaway
County county-wide stay of community notification
Pickaway
County Order Granting TRO 1
This
was issued in response to the Sample Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order above.
Pickaway
County Order Granting TRO 2
This was issued in response to
the Sample Motion for Temporary Restraining Order above.
Richland
County Order Staying Community Notification
Ross
County Entry Denying Counsel
Scioto
County Stay Order
(based on federal stay)
Stark
County Preliminary Injunction Order 1
The original entry, as
prepared by Magistrate Haupt, in Judge Haas' office.
Stark
County Preliminary Injunction Order 2
The version of the entry that
Judge Brown has signed, and will continue to sign for petitions styled
as civil cases.
Stark
County Preliminary Injunction Order 3
The version of the entry
Judge Brown has signed, and will continue to sign for petitions filed
in the underlying criminal cases.
Stark
County Preliminary Injunction Order, Time-Stamped
Stark
County Entry Clarifying Application of AWA, filed May 14, 2008
Summit
County County-wide Stay Order
Trumbull
County Entry declaring petitions civil and denying appointment of
counsel
Union
County county-wide stay
Van
Wert County Preliminary Injunction Entry
Challenges
Class
Action Lawsuit, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Filed
by the Cuyahoga County Public Defender Office, the Office of the Ohio Public
Defender, the ACLU of Ohio Foundation, and the Ohio Justice and Policy Center,
this lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that the 60-day time limit on the
filing of challenge petitions and the provisions that require community
notification for newly-classified Tier III offenders without a prior hearing
violate the procedural aspect of the Due Process Clause.
Class
Action Lawsuit, Hamilton County
Filed
by the Ohio Justice and Policy Center, this lawsuit challenges the
constitutionality of Senate Bill 10 based on the Contracts Clause,
Retroactivity Clause, Due Process Clause, Double Jeopardy Clause, Inalienable
Rights Clause, and Separation of Powers Doctrine of the Ohio Constitution.
Class
Action Lawsuit, Licking County
Filed
by the Ohio Justice and Policy Center on behalf of adult and juvenile
registrants, this lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of Senate Bill 10
based on the Contracts Clause, Retroactivity Clause, Due Process Clause,
Double Jeopardy Clause, Inalienable Rights Clause, and Separation of Powers
Doctrine of the Ohio Constitution.
Appeals
-
State of
Ohio ex rel. S___ K___ v. Hon. Jeffrey M. Welbaum, Judge
Filed in the 2nd
District, this is a complaint for a writ of mandamus and/or
prohibition, asking the Court to order Judge Welbaum to appoint
counsel at state expense to represent Ms. K. in her efforts to
challenge reclassification under SB 10.
-
In
re Darian S.
Filed in the 3rd
District, this appeal concerns the classification of a juvenile
offender. Contains constitutional arguments, as well as the
argument that because of the effective dates of SB 10, there was no
sex offender classification law in effect from July 1 through Dec.
31, 2007.
-
State
of Ohio vs. M_____ B____
Filed in the 7th District, this appeal from the Municipal
Court of Columbiana County challenges the application of SB 10 to a
defendant whose offense occurred prior to the enactment of SB 10.
Contains constitutional claims, as well as the argument that because
of the effective dates of SB 10, there was no sex offender
classification law in effect from July 1 through Dec. 31, 2007.
County
Information
|